
Scientists from The Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton and the University of California discovered that the underlying process in tumor formation is the same as for life itself--evolution.
After analyzing a half million gene mutations, the researchers found that although different gene mutations control different cancer pathways, each pathway was controlled by only one set of gene mutations. This suggests that a molecular “survival of the fittest” scenario plays out in every living creature as gene mutations strive for ultimate survival through cancerous tumors. This finding, which appears in the August 2008 issue of
The FASEB Journal, improves our understanding of how evolution shapes life in all forms, while laying a foundation for new cancer drugs and treatments.
“This study lays the groundwork for understanding the nature of different mutations in cancers,” said Chen-Hsiang Yeung, first author of the study, “and helps with understanding the mechanisms of cancers and their responses to drug treatments.”
To arrive at these conclusions, researchers analyzed about 500,000 cancer mutation records from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer database and then divided the data into 45 tissue types. Within each tissue type, they calculated the frequency that multiple genes were mutated in the same sample. They identified the frequencies of mutations that were significantly higher or lower than if the genes had mutated independently. Then they mapped out how these genes ultimately lead to cancerous tumors and checked whether the genes occurring in specific tissues used the same or different cancer pathways.
“Little could Darwin have known that his ‘Origin of the Species’ would one day explain the ‘Origin of the Tumor,’” said Gerald Weissmann, MD, Editor-in-Chief of The FASEB Journal. “This research report completely changes our understanding of the many gene mutations that cause cancer.”
FASEB Journal
Comments
not exactly a discovery
The idea that tumors emerge through a kind of evolutionary process in the body has been around since the 70s, I believe, so I don't think it's correct to refer to this as a discovery. It is important in the sense of providing strong empirical data to support that hypothesis - in fact I'd say based on this that the hypothesis is pretty nearly confirmed.
For an entirely different evolution-inspired look at cancer, take note of the Tasmanian Devil population which is being wiped out by a contagious cancer, spread through facial biting which apparently a fairly standard part of their sexual intercourse. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/02/0227_060227_tasmanian.ht...
This tumor is literally a distinct species which the Devils are passing to one another. One of the factors that makes this possible is that most Tasmanian Devils are very nearly genetically identical, having passed through a population bottleneck not long ago. Because of this, the tumors are much less likely to be identified by their immune systems as foreign and are not attacked.
cancer evolution
Can't somebody say that cancer is a evolutionary mutation from one species of normal healthy cells to a completely new species of abnormal cancerous cells, albeit a short term evolutionary adaption due to the ultimate killing off of the host?
re: cancer evolution
That's exactly what the researchers are saying. So it makes sense that the most common cancers are in areas of the body that are constantly regenerating cells, like the skin and the linings of various tubes and cavities in your body (epithelial cells).