 |
|
| |

|
|
Consciousness: An Introduction
By Susan
Blackmore
Is there a theory that explains
the essence of consciousness? Or is consciousness itself
just an illusion? The "last great mystery of science," consciousness
was excluded from serious research for most of the last
century but is now a rapidly expanding area of study for
students of psychology, philosophy, and neuroscience. Recently
the topic has also captured growing popular interest. This
groundbreaking book is the first volume to bring together
all the major theories of consciousness studies – from
those rooted in traditional Western philosophy to those
coming out of neuroscience, quantum theory, and Eastern
philosophy. Broadly interdisciplinary, Consciousness: An
Introduction is divided into nine sections that examine
such topics as how subjective experiences arise from objective
brain processes, the basic neuroscience and neuropathology
of consciousness, altered states of consciousness, mystical
experiences and dreams, and the effects of drugs and meditation.
It also discusses the nature of self, the possibility of
artificial consciousness in robots, and the question of
whether or not animals are conscious. Enhanced by numerous
illustrations and profiles of important researchers, the
book also includes self-assessment questions, further reading
suggestions, and practical exercises that help bring the
subject to life. |
|
| |

|
| |

Top of page
|
|
Conversations on Consciousness
By Susan
Blackmore
The question What is consciousness?
provokes all kinds of responses, ranging from jokes about
psychedelic drugs to brow-furrowing discourses on life's
meaning. Nearly everyone has an opinion, despite the
lack of meaningful data explaining the phenomenon. Susan
Blackmore
posed this question to 21 leading scientists and philosophers
who study consciousness for a living, compiling their
responses into lively, though slightly repetitive, Q&A interviews.
In each case, Blackmore asks, What's the problem with consciousness?
Why does it differ from other targets of scientific inquiry?
Several thinkers insist that it does not and that researchers
will fare better when they treat consciousness like anything
else in nature. Others assert that consciousness is fundamentally
different, constituting something extra beyond the ordinary
physical world. Says David Chalmers, an Australian mathematician-
turned-philosopher: The heart of the science of consciousness
is trying to understand the first-person perspective – to
explain subjective experiences objectively. In grappling
with what neuroscientists call the hard problem – the
struggle to explain how neural processes create subjective
experiences – the experts are long on theories but
short on answers. Nearly all agree that classical dualism
doesn't work – that the mind and brain cannot be
made of distinct substances. Many refer instead to the
neural correlates of consciousness, the neural activity
present during a person's conscious experience. Blackmore
queries the thinkers on such issues as life after death,
the self and free will. Most say they do not believe
in extracorporeal survival, in contrast with 55 percent
of
U.S. residents. Most also agree that scientific evidence
does not support the notion of free will, despite the
gripping feeling that it exists. And because the search
for the
source of a conscious I in the brain has turned up empty,
the existence of a distinct self seems remote, although
subjective awareness suggests each person needs a self
to experience consciousness. Blackmore also asks the
researchers why they chose to study consciousness and
how doing so
has affected their lives. |
|
| |

|
| |

Top of page
|
|
The Meme Machine
By Susan
Blackmore
Over a decade ago, Richard
Dawkins, who contributes a foreword to this book, coined
the term "meme" for a unit of culture that is
transmitted via imitation and naturally "selected" by
popularity or longevity. Dawkins used memes to show that
the theory known as Universal Darwinism, according to which "all
life evolves by the differential survival of replicating
entities," applies to more than just genes. Now, building
on his ideas, psychologist Blackmore contends that memes
can account for many forms of human behavior that do not
obviously serve the "selfish gene." For example,
a possible gene-meme co-evolution among early humans could
have selected for true altruism among humans: people who
help others (whether or not they are related) can influence
them and thus spread their memes. Meme transmission would
also explain some thorny problems in sociobiology. From
a gene's point of view, celibacy, birth control and adoption
are horrible mistakes. From a meme's point of view, they
are a gold mine. Few or no children free up the meme-carrier
to devote more energy to horizontal transmission to non-relatives
(monks and nuns the world over figured that out long ago),
something the gene is incapable of. With adoption, memes
can even co-opt vertical transmission between generations.
Blackmore posits that, in modern culture, meme replication
has almost completely overwhelmed the glacially slow gene
replication. |
|
| |
|
| |

Top of page |
|
The Conscious Mind
By David Chalmers
What is consciousness? How
do physical processes in the brain give rise to the self-aware
mind and to feelings as profoundly varied as love or hate,
aesthetic pleasure or spiritual yearning? These questions
today are among the most hotly debated issues among scientists
and philosophers, and we have seen in recent years superb
volumes by such eminent figures as Francis
Crick, Daniel
C. Dennett, Gerald Edelman, and Roger
Penrose, all firing
volleys in what has come to be called the consciousness wars.
Now, in The Conscious Mind, philosopher David J. Chalmers
offers a cogent analysis of this heated debate as he unveils
a major new theory of consciousness, one that rejects the
prevailing reductionist trend of science, while offering
provocative insights into the relationship between mind and
brain. Writing in a rigorous, thought-provoking style, the
author takes us on a far-reaching tour through the philosophical
ramifications of consciousness. Chalmers convincingly reveals
how contemporary cognitive science and neurobiology have
failed to explain how and why mental events emerge from physiological
occurrences in the brain. He proposes instead that conscious
experience must be understood in an entirely new light – as
an irreducible entity (similar to such physical properties
as time, mass, and space) that exists at a fundamental level
and cannot be understood as the sum of its parts. And after
suggesting some intriguing possibilities about the structure
and laws of conscious experience, he details how his unique
reinterpretation of the mind could be the focus of a new
science. Throughout the book, Chalmers provides fascinating
thought experiments that trenchantly illustrate his ideas.
For example, in exploring the notion that consciousness could
be experienced by machines as well as humans, Chalmers asks
us to imagine a thinking brain in which neurons are slowly
replaced by silicon chips that precisely duplicate their
functions – as the neurons are replaced, will consciousness
gradually fade away? The book also features thoughtful discussions
of how the author's theories might be practically applied
to subjects as diverse as artificial intelligence and the
interpretation of quantum mechanics. |
|
| |

|
| |

Top of page |
|
The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul
By Francis Crick
Nobel Prize-winning biochemist
Crick (co-discoverer with James Watson of DNA's double helix
structure) here takes readers to the forefront of modern
brain research. Geared to serious lay readers and scientists,
this speculative study argues that our minds can be explained,
without recourse to religious concepts of a soul, in terms
of the interactions of a vast assembly of nerve cells and
associated molecules. Crick delves into the nature of consciousness
by focusing on visual awareness, an active, constructive
process in which the brain selectively combines discrete
elements into meaningful images. Early chapters include numerous
interactive illustrations to demonstrate the brain's shortcuts,
tricks and habits of visual perception. In later chapters
Crick discusses neural networks – electronic pathways
that can "remember" patterns or produce spoken
language – and outlines research strategies designed
to pinpoint the brain's "awareness neurons" that
enable us to see. |
|
| |

|
| |

Top of page |
|
Descarts'
Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
By Antonio Damasio
The idea that the mind exists
as a distinct entity from the body has profoundly influenced
Western culture since
Descartes proclaimed, "I think, therefore I am." Damasio,
head of neurology at the University of Iowa and a prominent
researcher on human brain function, challenges this premise
in a fascinating and well-reasoned argument on the central
role that emotion and feelings play in human rationality.
According to Damasio, the same brain structures regulate
both human biology and behavior and are indispensable to
normal cognitive processes. Damasio demonstrates how patients
(his own as well as the 19th-century railroad worker Nicholas
Gage) with prefrontal cortical damage can no longer generate
the emotions necessary for effective decision-making. A gifted
scientist and writer, Damasio combines an Oliver Sack-like
reportage with the presentation of complex, theoretical issues
in neurobiology. Recommended for wide purchase. |
|
| |

|
| |

Top of page |
|
Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
By Antonio Damasio
The third in a series that
began with Descartes' Error, this book deftly combines recent
advances in neuroscience with charged meditations on foundational
17th-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza, and the result is
Damasio's fullest report so far on the nature of feelings.
A Salk Institute professor and head of the department of
neurology at the University of Iowa Medical Center, Damasio
makes a useful distinction between emotions, which are publicly
observable body states, and feelings, which are mental events
observable only to the person having them. Based on neuroscience
research he and others have done, Damasio argues that an
episode of emoting begins with an emotionally "competent" stimulus
(such as an attractive person or a scary house) that the
organism automatically appraises as conducive to survival
or well-being (a good thing) or not conducive (bad). This
appraisal takes the form of a complex array of physiological
reactions (e.g., quickening heartbeat, tensing facial muscles),
which is mapped in the brain. From that map, a feeling arises
as "an idea of the body when it is perturbed by the
emoting process." Because they "bear witness to
the state of life deep within," feelings are a vital
guide to decision-making. Damasio goes on to connect his
own views to Spinoza's and sympathize with that thinker's "secular
religiosity," which identified God with nature. He ends
by discussing spiritual feelings, which he relates to "the
sense that the organism is functioning with the greatest
possible perfection." Given his professional background,
it is not surprising that Damasio is more persuasive when
talking neuroscience than philosophy. But overall, he succeeds
in making the latest brain research accessible to the general
reader, while his passionate Spinozist reflections make that
data relevant to everyday life. |
|
| |

|
| |

Top of page |
|
The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness
By Antonio Damasio
Tackling a great complex of
questions that poets, artists and philosophers have contemplated
for generations, Damasio (Descartes' Error) examines current
neurological knowledge of human consciousness. Significantly,
in key passages he evokes T.S. Eliot, Shakespeare and William
James. In Eliot's words, consciousness is "music heard
so deeply/That it is not heard at all." It, like Hamlet,
begins with the question "Who's there?" And Damasio
holds that there is, as James thought, a "stream of" consciousness
that utilizes every part of the brain. Consciousness, argues
Damasio, is linked to emotion, to our feelings for the images
we perceive. There are in fact several kinds of consciousness,
he says: the proto-self, which exists in the mind's constant
monitoring of the body's state, of which we are unaware;
a core consciousness that perceives the world 500 milliseconds
after the fact; and the extended consciousness of memory,
reason and language. Different from wakefulness and attention,
consciousness can exist without language, reason or memory:
for example, an amnesiac has consciousness. But when core
consciousness fails, all else fails with it. More important
for Damasio's argument, emotion and consciousness tend to
be present or absent together. At the height of consciousness,
above reason and creativity, Damasio places conscience, a
word that preceded conciousness by many centuries. The author's
plain language and careful redefinition of key points make
this difficult subject accessible for the general reader.
In a book that cuts through the old nature vs. nurture argument
as well as conventional ideas of identity and possibly even
of soul, it's clear, though he may not say so, that Damasio
is still on the side of the angels. |
|
| |

|
| |

Top of page |
|
Brainchildren: Essays on Designing Minds
By Daniel Dennett
The author of Darwin's Dangerous
Idea and Consciousness Explained here collects essays from
conference volumes and "specialized journals" that
have appeared from 1984 to 1996, with the idea of making
them available "for students and other readers." But
any reader curious about the nuts and bolts of recent theories
of mind and our attempts at modeling it will find even Dennett's
technical side accessible enough, given a willingness to
be occasionally thrown in medias res. The lead essay, "Can
Machines Think?" is a clearly formulated reassessment
of current contenders for passing the Turing test, the criterion
by which thinking machines are judged. "Speaking for
Our Selves" evaluates claims for the legitimacy of multiple
personality disorder, and extends the discussion into questioning
the notion of selfhood. "Real Patterns," which
Dennett calls "utterly central to my thinking," is
tougher going, as Dennett seems to be addressing an ongoing
dispute among philosophers about what it might mean for a
belief to be "real," but the essay rewards repeated
reading. A section on animal cognition and one on the philosophical
possibility of zombies are further draws, but many of the
other essays and reviews will hold interest only for the
specialist. Throughout, however, Dennett's careful attention
to word choice and definition helps the uninitiated along,
and reveals one of our most celebrated and controversial
philosophers of mind at work. |
|
| |
  |
   
|